Scenarios

The shape of the problem we build for

Three composite situations, drawn from the patterns we see rather than from named engagements. If one of them reads like your firm, that is the conversation to have.

These are illustrative. We do not publish client work: a firm that would put your name on its website is not one to hand your institutional memory to. When we can describe real engagements with permission, they will appear here and they will be labelled as such.

Private wealth management

The situation

A senior portfolio manager holds twelve years of investment rationale across email threads, handwritten notes and recollection. Building a new position means re-deriving analysis that has already been done — sometimes years earlier, sometimes by themselves.

What we would build

One searchable body of position history, client context and market notes, with the reasoning attached to each decision rather than stored separately from it. New positions start from what is already known.

Advisory firm

The situation

A boutique practice with three senior partners has no shared knowledge layer. Client context, sector intelligence and regulatory understanding sit separately in three heads. Nothing can be delegated without being explained first.

What we would build

A firm-wide memory that new people can join into. Client knowledge becomes transferable and reviewable, and onboarding stops depending on a partner having a free afternoon.

Executive leadership

The situation

An executive is running six strategic initiatives, three board commitments and a complicated stakeholder map at once. The cost is not the work itself — it is the hours lost reloading context between them.

What we would build

Relevant context arrives ahead of each meeting and decision without anyone preparing it by hand. The switching cost does not disappear, but it stops being paid in the executive’s own time.

If your situation is not on this page, it is more likely that we have not written it up than that we have not seen it.